lfigueroa
Verified Member
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2004
- Messages
- 2,540
I also think one should consider how the game has changed.
Not so long ago I wrote how, way before, you could get away with making a few balls and ducking. Nowadays, given the chance, you better get a bunch or you're a dead duck.
So I believe the old adage of the break being worth a ball or two may no longer *strictly* apply.
Rather, it is much more of a floating line that depends on the skill level and strengths and weakness of the players involved in a very specific set of circumstances. It's probably always been that way but it's a more significant issue now, given the higher level of play. In some cases, maybe the break don't matter so much because the other guy lacks the skills to effectively get out of the break and turn it around and hurt you. Then it depends on how likely the guy is likely to goof up and how likely it is that you are able to grab a bunch. So in part, it's a factor of how well the players play.
Lou Figueroa
Not so long ago I wrote how, way before, you could get away with making a few balls and ducking. Nowadays, given the chance, you better get a bunch or you're a dead duck.
So I believe the old adage of the break being worth a ball or two may no longer *strictly* apply.
Rather, it is much more of a floating line that depends on the skill level and strengths and weakness of the players involved in a very specific set of circumstances. It's probably always been that way but it's a more significant issue now, given the higher level of play. In some cases, maybe the break don't matter so much because the other guy lacks the skills to effectively get out of the break and turn it around and hurt you. Then it depends on how likely the guy is likely to goof up and how likely it is that you are able to grab a bunch. So in part, it's a factor of how well the players play.
Lou Figueroa