Scrzbill
Verified Member
Why did we have a vote on 32, 48, none, if everybody is going to fight for what they want afterwards. It's all a bunch of bull. What the ......is going on?
The 32 man limit won, deal with it.
But people can't deal with it so they want to do something else. First it was a two day event hoping for 16, then a three day event with thirty two. Now an unlimited event with who knows how many hours days and weeks will be involved. Too many chefs in the kitchen and everyone is preparing their own meals.
This is bull and I am tired of it. My reservations have been made and they are non refundable but I will be damned if I will spend the next two months reading about those who want a large field, a small field, a three day event, a two day event, an unmanageable, event because of egos. Now we are talking about a round robin. Where has a one pocket event been a round robin except when it was an invitational event. This is an open event for one pocket.org players and users of one pocket.org who have been commenting for years. Who are all of these locals who Joey is bringing in, shills? I don't play in the California event going on now because it is a two and out. I want to have fun and be able to win a game or two, not have to play a bunch of ringers that never participate in the forum.
Why don't we do this. Have a tournament sponsored by one pocket.org and everyone, their mothers, daughters, brothers, and in laws are eligible to play.
Play will start at 6 pm Friday night and continue until the last standing person on Sunday night at midnight.:sorry
Five, ten, people cannot be in charge of what is going on. Disco Dave had a vote. No one complained about the number of people as choices. The majority of the votes were for a 32 man limit. Now what? Oh that vote? That was a trial ballon. This is like a Donald Ztrump stump. One day it is one thing and two days later, it means something else.
I just want to know one thing. Who is going to reimburse me for me pre paid flight because what I am reading is bull and if this continues, have the tournament without me.
I want to know if the vote we had by Dave had any meaning? What was the purpose? Who decided that the poll was unfair? Was too be ignored?:frus
The 32 man limit won, deal with it.
But people can't deal with it so they want to do something else. First it was a two day event hoping for 16, then a three day event with thirty two. Now an unlimited event with who knows how many hours days and weeks will be involved. Too many chefs in the kitchen and everyone is preparing their own meals.
This is bull and I am tired of it. My reservations have been made and they are non refundable but I will be damned if I will spend the next two months reading about those who want a large field, a small field, a three day event, a two day event, an unmanageable, event because of egos. Now we are talking about a round robin. Where has a one pocket event been a round robin except when it was an invitational event. This is an open event for one pocket.org players and users of one pocket.org who have been commenting for years. Who are all of these locals who Joey is bringing in, shills? I don't play in the California event going on now because it is a two and out. I want to have fun and be able to win a game or two, not have to play a bunch of ringers that never participate in the forum.
Why don't we do this. Have a tournament sponsored by one pocket.org and everyone, their mothers, daughters, brothers, and in laws are eligible to play.
Play will start at 6 pm Friday night and continue until the last standing person on Sunday night at midnight.:sorry
Five, ten, people cannot be in charge of what is going on. Disco Dave had a vote. No one complained about the number of people as choices. The majority of the votes were for a 32 man limit. Now what? Oh that vote? That was a trial ballon. This is like a Donald Ztrump stump. One day it is one thing and two days later, it means something else.
I just want to know one thing. Who is going to reimburse me for me pre paid flight because what I am reading is bull and if this continues, have the tournament without me.
I want to know if the vote we had by Dave had any meaning? What was the purpose? Who decided that the poll was unfair? Was too be ignored?:frus