yeah sorta id get on that side of the stack at leastCowboy Dennis said:
That shot is good when you can hide the rock behind some balls, leaving it in the open is a little tougher. Where's that Ghost when we need the carnival picture ?lll said:i hate to go against rod
but i wish i had that pic of ringling bros and barnum and bailey poster ghost used to post when .......................you know the kind of shot
Cowboy Dennis said:
"a move up", now that's a term I know very well, Freddy B. has talked of it many times on AccuStats commentary. It takes a long time to understand it and now that I can't play I know exactly what it means .senor said:You will be a move up on your opponent
I like your shot Rod, it's not such a gofer. Not only do you have a good chance to pocket that ball but there is a reward behind it. I also like the fact that you are taking a couple of balls out of play for Jose.androd said:Looks like my kinda gofer.
Rod.
teach me pleaseFrank Almanza said:I like your shot Rod, .
That's a good shot if it was available, it doesn't look like it was.schitzngigglz said:How about kicking the 1 ball full with lower right english?
Rick
I like the shot even with a 20% or 30% make possibility because you can win the game from there. All five balls that are needed are in position. You will remove the 3, 13, 12, or the 14 out of play at the same time.lll said:teach me please
if you miss the cue ball is in an unobstructive position to remove all the balls from the opponents pocket
i dont think the shot is an %80 make(icbw)
whats to like??
absolutely no disrespect intended??
i just dont get it
petie said:I like Rod's shot and have since the beginning of this thread. It's the first shot I saw but when Rod posted it, I figured everyone would agree on it. What else do you have? With all respect, Senor's shot runs a great risk of missing the strip on the high side thus selling it out. If Rod misses his hole, at least he forces his oppo to deal with his fertile balls (how's that for a term?) thus wasting his shot doing that instead of scoring.