Style points aside, you are comparing those guys (RA,Taylor, etc.)with their peers...at the time.
Lenny was asking for a comparison of old vs. young. It can be very difficult trying to make those comparisons, when you have 20, 30, or 40 years separating their repective prime's, i.e, Scott Frost vs Ronnie Allen, or Gabe Owens vs. Grady...those matches can NEVER be played.
Thats why I was saying, all thats left is conjecture. We all know How good Ronnie, Kelley or Red, played one pocket (if we were around) to say they did not compare with Efren, may be true (few, if any did)
But you have to admit, Bill... those guys often found a way to win, and the talent pool, in Efren's prime, was much depleted from their days.
Also, except for the Jansco run, there was no DCC, or anywhere near the number of quality tournaments for them to compete in.
I keep comparing it to boxing, but boxing, in its hayday, was fairly well structured, with regard to ranking, etc. (There could be some comparisons to pool, regarding the occasional "funny business" too..
)
Thats the point I'm trying to make..."its not always the dog in the fight, but the fight in the dog". Like you Bill, the old guy's were never short on heart. And they could all draw their rock...remember ?
Would Marciano have beaten Ali ? Or Sugar Ray Leonard have beaten Jake LaMotta.... All we have is our opinion... We will NEVER really know.
.