hey why not!
nice break whitey..I appreciate the inventiveness
serious question:
are there any 1p circles where it would be frowned upon
to not hit the "classic" 1p break?
playing nine-ball, you gotta hit the one ball first, etc.
does 1p have any rules like that about the break?
ps don't mean to hijack another fun thread whitey
I can get this going elsewhere if *it* is frowned upon
thanks~sean
On the break, it is allowed to first contact any ball within the stack. You can also go to a rail and then into the stack of balls but when doing this you should verbally declare your scoring pocket.
But Yes, there is one break that I would assume would be frowned upon but is perfectly legal. I am no expert in this field for I seldom play OP, just played twice since the 2018 MOT. The break is to softly roll the cb into the head ball and freezing it against the top of the rack sending a sole ball to the foot rail and in front of their scoring pocket.
I personally would not play someone that used this break, for the balls remain in a tight stack prolonging the game tremendously.
In talking to a fellow member about this break, he stated; " I can see a use for it when my opponent is always getting out of a standard break or when the standard break is selling out. I would then use it to change it up".
Baby Huey stated; "a legal break should require two balls going to the rail, like the cue ball and an object ball, for that is what happens anyway".
This would eliminate the head on head ball soft safety break. But, it would also eliminate the unusual break of contacting a rail first for that usually only sends one ball to the rail.
So to adjust then this rule: it is required that two balls contact a rail on the break, either two object balls, or the cue ball and an object ball. Unless utilizing an unusual rail first break then only one ball has to contact a rail.
If express rules were ever developed then the above rule would insure the head on head ball soft break would not be used.
Whitey