John,
Ha-ha....my friend, the innuendoligist.......le'me help you. "Ignore the crybabies" is what matters. Crybabies for me are those who take positions that are irrational and only for their own short sided and selfish reasons. Kinda like in our politics, which we can't discuss here, peoples egos or desire to be relevant lead them to be unable to admit being wrong when the truth is all around them and obvious.
In this context it is the chain of events that led us to the rules adopted in this tournament, which are not so important in the scheme of things, but illustrate a dangerous phenomena that can lead us all down the wrong path.
It goes or went like this....."I don't like the way you racked for me", "I'll rack my own", "I don't like how you racked for yourself...if you make a ball, you'll have to rack again". "Oh yeah, well then if I make a ball my scratches don't count cause that would penalize me twice"....

..I can't imagine where they think the FIRST penalty came from.
So, where has this gotten us? We can no longer make a ball on the break and continue shooting, which I happen to like, but couldn't we have gotten there by just adopting a rule that says "you break and sit down" in the first place without forgiving scratching on the break. I call the proponents of all this "crybabies" because there is NO advantage to be had by either player in this whole discussion. The argument from start to finish is MOOT, solves no problem, and does not improve the game, but has changed it....
If you want to hear about a rule change that does solve a problem and could improve the game just ask.....