jrhendy
Verified Member
I like your game Mitch, but I don’t think you can give him that much.Our game is 11/7 or you’re bad action. Just sayin….
I like your game Mitch, but I don’t think you can give him that much.Our game is 11/7 or you’re bad action. Just sayin….
That's true. And he can't help his disposition...Jason, I have not read any comments past your first entry. But, yes, you are bad action because you always win !
That Louisiana cuisine has to make it tough for anybody!!You are indeed bad action…;at the buffet!
Unfortunately, it's tough to make that statement as you haven't lost yet. But, if true, then indeed that person is "bad action". Please bear in mind that if you are willing to lose more than you can make then you made a "bad" game. However, if you've played for several hours and broke even, not a bad result. I guess you'll have to get ahead at the beginning to see if he quits early.The short answer is that I do not think you are bad action.
I am not saying I have a monopoly on the term "bad action", but when I think of "bad action", I think of a game where the upside to your winning is low, but there is a chance for you to lose much more than you could win. For example. there is a player here that plays close to me, but I like my end of it. However, he is not patient, he is a good banker, aggressive, and he never has much money.
When I go to the pool room to gamble, I always have several barrels for whatever I am doing. Anyway, I offered to play this guy cheap. In the first game, he plays super aggressive and everything goes. The universe is raining balls into his hole. I stick with it. We play for several hours. At one point I am stuck 3 games. We are not playing for a lot ($20 a game), and I fight my way back to even. He quits. This happens several times in different sessions, although I do not always get back to even.
He doesn't play better than me, but his strategy is to try and bury me in the first game and play from ahead. If he would lose the first game, (which he never did) I think he would have pulled up right then, paid off for the game and hit the road.
So, in playing him, I have the opportunity to lose however much I am willing and I can only win $20. To me, that is bad action.
kollegedave
Every time I ever got ahead of the guy he pulls up. The occasions that I actually won are so old I hesitate to include them in recent results. However, other players have noticed this as well. The guy won't stand and fight, so playing him by the game means you can win $20 or lose whatever. I just don't play him. If I did, going forward I might play him in a long race for a larger sum of money. He needs something to give him some pause before he shoots his crazy flyers that often go well, and I need time for percentages to catch up with him.Unfortunately, it's tough to make that statement as you haven't lost yet. But, if true, then indeed that person is "bad action". Please bear in mind that if you are willing to lose more than you can make then you made a "bad" game. However, if you've played for several hours and broke even, not a bad result. I guess you'll have to get ahead at the beginning to see if he quits early.
Thats what happened all the time at the Rack when I played MiamiI learned what "bad action" was years ago when I played a guy and lost $80. The next time I played, I won $20 and he pulled up on me. Never lose more than what your opponent will lose.
is that bad action for you or smart money management for him?I learned what "bad action" was years ago when I played a guy and lost $80. The next time I played, I won $20 and he pulled up on me. Never lose more than what your opponent will lose.
see post aboveThats what happened all the time at the Rack when I played Miami
what table at the rack was a $20 dollar table????Thats what happened all the time at the Rack when I played Miami