Cary
Verified Member
Yes, the finishing is the same. I still wonder about the actual composition of the ball. Note, ferinstance, that their tournament balls are made with "Duramith Technology."
Here's the Aramith blurb:
"The Aramith Tournament set features the Duramith technology with its hi-tech engineered molecular structure enhancing drastically the longevity of the balls while minimizing signicantly table cloth wear. With a life-time that exceeds up to 8 times that of the average polyester and phenol-like resins, reaching easily up to 40 years in residential use, Aramith ball sets are the logical choice for both the trade and the player.
Duramith™ - the new benchmark
With the Duramith™ Technology, the Aramith resins entered their 4th generation. With a totally overhauled resin formulation with new hi-tech reticulation, crosslinking and curing technologies, the Aramith products now set a new benchmark in quality, durability & longevity, increasing their service life up to 50% during which: their through-hardened vitried surface and core holds their glossy look; their specications, rebound and playing consistency throughout the set is maintained all along; the cloth wear and white marks that so easily ruin the look of the table are minimized; their friction resistance minimizes burn spots as well."
With all the folks noting a difference in playing characteristics between the RC and MB, you have to wonder if some variation of the usual recipe wasn't used in making the MB.
Lou Figueroa
Lou, you may have missed my post #31 which gives the information Aramith sent me earlier (couldn't copy & past so it's summarized). The "measles" ball and the red circle ball are indeed made of different resins, although the "measles" ball, red logo ball, and the Brunswick Centennial are all of the same resin and made to the same specifications. In essence, any differences between those three balls are unintentional manufacturing variances.