WE no the rules now so what now. And the rule is not clear and can be diputed two was. And both sides have a argument and can be wright. So change the rule or play by what it is. A bad rule. Its the choice of the people who make the rules change it or live with it. And everything stays the same. And the rule is not a good rule. The rule has to meny loop holes in it and if you cant see it needs to change. Then live by it. Its only a pool rule and who cares that its not a ood rule. WE will play by what it is weather its good or bad. And please whatever you do dont change it and make it better.gulfportdoc said:It certainly does, Tom. I also quoted the rule in post #10: However, if the non-shooting player disturbs the balls, or breaks down their stick, or in the judgment of the acting official otherwise significantly disturbs the shooter in the assumption that the shooter is already out, such acts are considered a concession, and the shooter is considered to have won, regardless of whether a subsequent count reveals that more balls are needed.
After his last shot, Roy moved his scoring bead above the light. John then came over, checked the ball tray, and went back and sat down, allowing Roy to rack. If that's not a concession, I don't know what is. What does John have to do? Go out and get a notarized statement that he has conceded the game?