Dr Bill brought up a good point, 40 years ago there was not as many people playing 1P as there are now, in the past 30 years its became "the" game in America, and there are lots more guys playing, young guys under 30 that can really play.
When i started going to the pool room in 85 i'd say 40%-50% was one pocket action, some one handed(dont see that much anymore), by 95 80% of the action was 1P, now its 95% of the action on the west coast anyways. Im in europe right now, there is ZERO 1P here, everyone is keen to play it with me, there is lots of interest from most everyone i meet here to play 1P, one guy is a 200 ball runner in straight pool-21 years old. problem is its a gambling game and there is no action here. So when i leave they dont play it any more,
Back to the topic,
Ronnie was a great gambler, so was "Red", and other players of that era were too, perhaps better gamblers than todays players. Thats what made Ronnie so great IMO. He could gamble, i men really gamble. not one set and out/cry. With so many more people playing 1P there is naturally a higher level of competition, thus the top guy has to be better now than the top guy from 40 years ago, I think, no knock on RA, just a numbers game. IMO Efren is the guy to beat, i said that the first time i saw him in hardtimes in 86 or 87 and nobody was paying attention to him. To this day i still think efren is the best i ever saw, and someday i might see someone better, not yet tho....