straightback
Verified Member
Wait, are you saying that this thread is about a one pocket situation?
I don't care what the fukk we talk about as long as we argue about something. Carry on.
Wait, are you saying that this thread is about a one pocket situation?
Is like to nominate this for the most entertaining wwyd ever!! It's the thread that keeps on giving .
Something's amiss, I do believe.
I see say's the blind man, you are as smart as you say you are. I'm trying to help you get into action and your more concerned with showing people your harsh manners, I thought more highly of you Lou, imagine. Your style of dealing with people make you quite the target for many people, but that doesn't seem to bother you as you enjoy this kind of back and forth.
Lou Figueroa< assertions are my life.:heh
Dr. Bill
oh, you mean this:
"Lou, I talked to the Hacker and he is in total agreement that he handled this whole thing with you wrong. He actually wants me to represent him with the negotiations with you on making a game at the Derby."
And then just a few posts later, this:
"...I didn't even talk to the Hacker about this privately. I actually took it on my own to say this feeling that the Hacker wouldn't mind me speaking for him because it just may help in getting him down with you."
tsk, tsk. I would say there might be a bit of a credibility problem there.
Lou Figueroa
what to believe
what to believe
Credibility problem? I don't think so Lou, I merely told you a "white lie" (harmless) you furthered it to make an assumption and then slandered me. You seem to be very astute by twisting unethical comments (made by you) into being less than what they are. What do you call that Lou? You don't post often here, but when you do it seems that there's always some sort of a confrontation, I call that a "character flaw" others may call that a.f.a.h.:heh
You need all the help you can get with your self righteous conduct. Your pen is your sword, and you have a way with sticking it up your ass and either don't know it or don't give a shit, either way it's a problem you have and yes, you do need help. Now, do you want to play the Hacker a game that you may like or are you going to hide behind your sword?
Dr. Bill< will play a little myself and give you a ball.
Credibility problem? I don't think so Lou, I merely told you a "white lie" (harmless) you furthered it to make an assumption and then slandered me. You seem to be very astute by twisting unethical comments (made by you) into being less than what they are. What do you call that Lou? You don't post often here, but when you do it seems that there's always some sort of a confrontation, I call that a "character flaw" others may call that a.f.a.h.:heh
You need all the help you can get with your self righteous conduct. Your pen is your sword, and you have a way with sticking it up your ass and either don't know it or don't give a shit, either way it's a problem you have and yes, you do need help. Now, do you want to play the Hacker a game that you may like or are you going to hide behind your sword?
Dr. Bill< will play a little myself and give you a ball.
slander |ˈslandər|
noun Law
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation.
What fantasy world are you living in?
In the first place, it'd be libel.
Second, you post two contradictory statements. You admit to lying. And I’m slandering (should be libeling) you for pointing out that that creates a credibility problem? I think you're the one who needs help (and a good reality check).
Confrontation here? Who came at me in this thread and then threw a barrage of insulting and demeaning posts at me? Now, you have your panties in a wad and say, “Your pen is your sword, and you have a way with sticking it up your ass …” I got news for you: mind your own business because those kinds of remarks make you no better than hacker. You said he handled it poorly? You are handling it worse.
Lastly, I have said it twice already in this thread, once directly to you not more than a couple of posts ago. I don’t know what your malfunction is but here it is, again, slowly:
hacker… can… go… pound… sand. Tu capisci?
Frankly, at this point, I’m enjoying watching you guys twist in the wind: you had me agreeing to 11-7, thought you had the nuts, and then blew it by acting all gangsta.
ha... ha... ha.
Lou Figueroa
I know i'm bringing a pocket knife to a sword fight
Dr. Bill
To be clear: it takes more than an unsavory statement to constitute libel. To wit, you must also show damage to your reputation as a result of the libelor's statements which he knew or should have known to be false.
Well, SB, I'll concede that damage must be shown to win a libel case, but I'd argue (uncertainly) that the written defamation itself amounts to libel.
The characters on this site would make a great reality pool show..
have a nice day
Well, SB, I'll concede that damage must be shown to win a libel case, but I'd argue (uncertainly) that the written defamation itself amounts to libel.
Lou, I am minding my business, you slandered me by asserting that my agenda was to manipulate you into playing Hacker for self serving reasons. Which is purely an assumption and not nearly enough to post what you did (slander) What ever I said in return you brought on yourself with your distasteful way of expressing yourself. My post could of been interpreted in many different ways, but yet you decided to read into it the way you usually do with every other issue that's discussed here, condescendingly. Now you're trying to belittle me for handling this foolishly like a child and "blowing" it because of that.:lol Once again, Lou's way of squirming and wiggling himself out of a embarrassing position that his mouth brought on but his heart won't allow.
I know i'm bringing a pocket knife to a sword fight but fortunately you stuck your sword up your ass again, did you anticipate that happening? You too are predictable.
Dr. Bill
To be clear: it takes more than an unsavory statement to constitute libel. To wit, you must also show damage to your reputation as a result of the libelor's statements which he knew or should have known to be false.
That's 100% correct John, i'm not interested in proving that his defamation of my character was costly in terms of awarding me financial damages, just the fact alone that is was libel is good enough for me. That's the part that shoved the sword..you know where.
All I really wanted to do was to create some action between Lou and Hacker. Lou misinterpreted my agenda as me trying to conspire with ISIS to bring him down and implied that it was in my character to do so. This was based off of a assumption, which actually makes it worse.
I'm not upset with Lou, nor do I want to change him, it wouldn't work any ways.
Dr. Bill