Dear Gentle Readers,
How about adding a girls’ division? Not a girl added to the team, but a team of girls. One on each side of the briny.
Benefits?
> It would showcase even more incredible talent.
> The three ensuing competitions -- boys, girls and coed doubles -- would refresh the formula. And would generate a lot of chatter about the coaches’ pairing decisions.
> There would be more matches per day to accommodate the additional players. Thus more value to the PPV and live audiences.
> Girls have, generally speaking, more personality. Many would present and interview better.
> For the most part, the girls would make more spectacular entrances. One or two notable exceptions on the boys’ side!
> More for the live spectators to cheer about.
(Of course we all realize that there is, at heart, probably only one reason to incur the additional expenses -- if it significantly increases the viewership for Matchroom.)
Uninformed, ill-conceived postulations are my life,
Sunny
How about adding a girls’ division? Not a girl added to the team, but a team of girls. One on each side of the briny.
Benefits?
> It would showcase even more incredible talent.
> The three ensuing competitions -- boys, girls and coed doubles -- would refresh the formula. And would generate a lot of chatter about the coaches’ pairing decisions.
> There would be more matches per day to accommodate the additional players. Thus more value to the PPV and live audiences.
> Girls have, generally speaking, more personality. Many would present and interview better.
> For the most part, the girls would make more spectacular entrances. One or two notable exceptions on the boys’ side!
> More for the live spectators to cheer about.
(Of course we all realize that there is, at heart, probably only one reason to incur the additional expenses -- if it significantly increases the viewership for Matchroom.)
Uninformed, ill-conceived postulations are my life,
Sunny
a big hit on PPV.
